Comparing Yamaha Viking and Wolverine Side by Side for Outdoor Adventures with John Bedsole's Insights
- John Bedsole
- Jan 7
- 4 min read
When it comes to choosing the right side-by-side vehicle for outdoor adventures, the decision often boils down to durability, performance, and versatility. Yamaha offers two popular models that fit these criteria: the Yamaha Viking and the Yamaha Wolverine. Both are designed to handle tough terrain, but they serve slightly different purposes. John Bedsole of Bedsole Outdoor Adventures, who relies heavily on the Viking for its ruggedness in the woods and on the farm, shares valuable insights that help clarify which model suits different outdoor needs best.
Yamaha Viking Overview
The Yamaha Viking is built for those who need a tough, reliable vehicle that can handle heavy-duty work and challenging terrain. It’s a favorite among farmers, hunters, and outdoor workers who require a machine that won’t quit when the going gets rough.
Key Features of the Yamaha Viking
Engine and Power: The Viking comes with a 686cc engine that delivers strong torque and smooth power. This engine size strikes a balance between power and fuel efficiency.
Seating Capacity: It comfortably seats three people, making it ideal for small teams or families.
Durability: The Viking’s frame and suspension are designed to withstand rough trails, heavy loads, and frequent use.
Cargo Capacity: It offers a large cargo bed with a 600-pound capacity, perfect for hauling tools, gear, or harvested game.
Towing Capability: The Viking can tow up to 1,500 pounds, which is useful for farm equipment or trailers.
John Bedsole emphasizes the Viking’s toughness, especially in the woods and on the farm. He notes that its rugged build and reliable engine make it a go-to vehicle for demanding outdoor tasks.
Yamaha Wolverine Overview
The Yamaha Wolverine is designed with a focus on versatility and comfort, making it a popular choice for recreational riders who want a mix of performance and style.
Key Features of the Yamaha Wolverine
Engine and Power: The Wolverine features a 847cc, twin-cylinder engine that provides more horsepower and torque than the Viking, offering a sportier ride.
Seating Capacity: It seats two people, focusing on a more personal riding experience.
Suspension and Handling: The Wolverine has advanced suspension systems that provide a smoother ride on rough terrain and better handling at higher speeds.
Cargo and Towing: While it has a smaller cargo bed and lower towing capacity compared to the Viking, it still handles light hauling tasks well.
Design and Comfort: The Wolverine includes more ergonomic seating and modern features aimed at rider comfort and convenience.
The Wolverine appeals to those who want a side-by-side that can handle trails with agility and speed, as well as provide a comfortable ride for recreational outings.
Comparing Performance and Use Cases
Ruggedness and Durability
The Viking stands out for its ruggedness. John Bedsole points out that the Viking’s heavy-duty frame and suspension make it ideal for farm work and navigating dense woods. It can handle rough terrain and heavy loads without compromising performance.
The Wolverine, while durable, is built more for agility and speed. Its suspension is tuned for smoother rides over uneven ground, but it may not hold up as well under heavy, constant work like the Viking.
Engine Power and Ride Experience
The Wolverine’s larger engine offers more horsepower, which translates to faster acceleration and higher top speeds. This makes it better suited for trail riding and recreational use where speed and handling are priorities.
The Viking’s engine focuses on torque and steady power delivery, which is better for towing and hauling. John Bedsole highlights that this makes the Viking more reliable for outdoor work that requires consistent power rather than bursts of speed.
Seating and Capacity
The Viking’s three-seat layout is practical for work crews or families who need to travel together. Its larger cargo bed and higher towing capacity also make it a better choice for hauling equipment or supplies.
The Wolverine’s two-seat design is more about rider comfort and style. It’s perfect for couples or solo riders who want a sportier experience but don’t need to carry as much gear.
Practical Examples from Bedsole Outdoor Adventures
John Bedsole shares how the Viking has been essential for his outdoor adventures and farm work. For example:
Hunting Trips: The Viking’s cargo bed carries hunting gear and game efficiently, while its rugged suspension handles off-trail terrain.
Farm Use: It tows trailers loaded with feed and equipment, saving time and effort on the farm.
Trail Navigation: Even on rough, muddy trails, the Viking maintains traction and stability, which is crucial for safety and efficiency.
While the Wolverine is not the primary vehicle at Bedsole Outdoor Adventures, it’s recognized for its agility and comfort on lighter trails and recreational rides.
Choosing the Right Side-by-Side for Your Needs
When deciding between the Yamaha Viking and Wolverine, consider these factors:
Purpose: If you need a workhorse for heavy-duty tasks, the Viking is the clear choice. For recreational riding with a focus on speed and comfort, the Wolverine fits better.
Passenger and Cargo Needs: More passengers and heavier loads favor the Viking. Smaller groups and lighter gear suit the Wolverine.
Terrain: Rough, challenging terrain with heavy loads calls for the Viking’s rugged build. Smoother trails and faster rides align with the Wolverine’s design.
Budget and Features: The Wolverine may come with more comfort features, but the Viking offers durability that can save money on repairs and replacements over time.
Final Thoughts on Yamaha Viking and Wolverine
Choosing between the Yamaha Viking and Wolverine depends on your outdoor lifestyle and needs. John Bedsole’s experience with the Viking highlights its unmatched toughness and reliability for demanding environments like farms and forests. The Wolverine offers a sportier, more comfortable ride for those who prioritize speed and handling on trails.
Comments